Class 11 Political Science Book 1 ch 4 practice quiz in English part 2 Posted on March 16, 2025March 16, 2025 by Anshul Gupta0% 0 votes, 0 avg 0 Class 11 Political Science Book 1 ch 4practice quiz in English part 2 1 / 201. What is the significance of the debates about reservation policies in India? A. They demonstrate that free markets always ensure a just distribution of resources B. They highlight the challenges in balancing different principles of justice C. They suggest that there is no need for government intervention to promote social justice D. They indicate that social justice is not a relevant issue in India Explanation: The controversies surrounding reservation policies illustrate the complexities of achieving social justice and the need to consider various perspectives.2 / 202. What is the main argument of those who support free markets in the context of social justice? A. Social justice is not a concern of the government and should be left to private charity B. The state should control all aspects of the economy to ensure fairness C. Free markets always lead to a just distribution of resources without any need for government intervention D. Individuals should be free to compete, and the state should only ensure a basic minimum standard of living and fair competition Explanation: Supporters of free markets believe that market mechanisms are generally efficient but acknowledge the need for some state intervention to ensure a basic safety net and fair competition.3 / 203. What is the purpose of reservations and quotas in the Indian context? A. To create a society with absolute equality of outcomes B. To give special privileges to certain groups without any justification C. To address historical disadvantages faced by certain groups and promote social justice D. To undermine the principle of merit and achievement Explanation: The passage mentions that reservations and quotas are intended to compensate for the lack of access to education and opportunities faced by marginalized groups like Scheduled Castes and Tribes.4 / 204. What is the role of governments in balancing different principles of justice? A. To ignore competing claims and focus on a single principle B. To prioritize the interests of the most powerful groups C. To create a society with absolute equality, regardless of individual differences D. To harmonize different principles to promote a just society Explanation: The passage suggests that governments need to find a balance between different principles of justice, such as equal treatment, proportionality, and recognition of special needs.5 / 205. What is the argument in favor of state intervention to provide basic services like education and healthcare? A. Private agencies always provide high-quality and affordable services to all B. Private agencies may not find it profitable to provide services in certain areas, leaving the disadvantaged without access C. State intervention always leads to better outcomes than market-based solutions D. State intervention stifles innovation and efficiency Explanation: The passage argues that state intervention may be necessary in cases where private providers fail to cater to the needs of the poor or those in remote areas.6 / 206. What is the main criticism of private enterprise in the context of social justice? A. It always prioritizes social responsibility over profits B. It tends to favor the already privileged and may not extend opportunities to the disadvantaged C. It promotes excessive government control over individual choices D. It eliminates the need for individual effort and merit Explanation: The passage suggests that while private enterprise can be efficient, it may not always benefit the most vulnerable members of society, leading to further inequalities.7 / 207. What is the significance of the concept of ‘giving each his due’ in the context of justice? A. It has remained unchanged throughout history B. It is determined solely by an individual's social status and wealth C. It implies giving special privileges to certain groups without any justification D. It is closely linked to our understanding of what is just and has evolved over time Explanation: The passage explains how the concept of ‘giving each his due’ has changed over time and is now connected to recognizing the inherent dignity and rights of all individuals.8 / 208. What is the significance of disagreements about justice in a democratic society? A. They are a sign of social instability and should be suppressed B. They hinder progress and development C. They force us to examine different perspectives and defend our own views rationally D. They undermine the authority of the government Explanation: The passage emphasizes that disagreements about justice can be healthy in a democracy, as they encourage debate and critical thinking.9 / 209. What is the significance of Rawls’ theory of justice? A. It relies on pre-determined moral norms and goals B. It promotes the idea that justice is arbitrary and subjective C. It suggests that fairness and justice can be derived from rational self-interest D. It prioritizes the interests of the most privileged Explanation: Rawls’ theory is unique because it doesn’t rely on pre-existing moral principles but instead shows how fairness can emerge from rational decision-making.10 / 2010. What is the overall message of the chapter regarding social justice? A. Social justice is best achieved through strict government control over individual choices B. Achieving social justice requires balancing different principles and addressing various forms of inequality C. Social justice is an abstract concept with no practical implications D. There is one universally agreed-upon definition of social justice Explanation: The chapter highlights the complexities of social justice, the need to consider different principles, and the ongoing debate about the best way to address inequalities.11 / 2011. What does a just society imply in terms of economic differences? A. Providing the basic minimum conditions for a healthy and secure life for all, along with equal opportunities B. Ignoring economic inequalities and focusing only on individual rights C. The elimination of any differences in wealth and income D. Absolute equality in living standards for all Explanation: A just society, according to the passage, aims to provide everyone with a basic standard of living and a fair chance to pursue their goals, even if there are some economic differences.12 / 2012. What is the responsibility of a democratic government in the context of social justice? A. To prioritize the interests of the most privileged and powerful B. To ignore the needs of the disadvantaged and focus on economic growth C. To ensure that all citizens have access to basic minimum conditions of life and equal opportunities D. To provide all citizens with identical outcomes, regardless of their circumstances Explanation: The passage suggests that a democratic government has a responsibility to provide a basic standard of living and equal opportunities to all its citizens, regardless of their background.13 / 2013. What is the purpose of considering the special needs of people in the context of justice? A. To undermine the principle of merit and achievement B. To favor certain groups over others C. To ensure that people with disabilities or disadvantages have equal opportunities D. To create a society with absolute equality of outcomes Explanation: Considering special needs is about recognizing that some individuals may require different treatment or support to ensure they have a fair chance in life14 / 2014. What is the connection between justice and morality in Rawls’ theory? A. Rawls' theory suggests that fairness and justice can be derived from rational self-interest, not just morality B. Rawls' theory argues that justice is arbitrary and subjective C. Rawls' theory prioritizes moral ideals over individual rights D. Rawls' theory relies on pre-determined moral norms and goals Explanation: Rawls’ theory is significant because it shows how fairness can emerge from rational decision-making, even without relying on pre-existing moral principles.15 / 2015. What is the main argument of John Rawls in favor of providing help to the least privileged members of society? A. It is a way to enforce absolute equality of outcomes B. It is an act of charity and generosity C. It can be rationally justified as being in the interest of everyone, even those who are better off D. It is necessary to maintain social order and prevent unrest Explanation: Rawls argues that even self-interested individuals, when placed under the ‘veil of ignorance,’ would choose policies that protect the least privileged, as they might end up in that position themselves.16 / 2016. What is the main idea behind the principle of ‘treating equals equally’? A. To ignore individual merit and achievements B. To ensure that individuals with similar characteristics and abilities are treated the same way C. To reward everyone equally, regardless of their effort or contribution D. To give special privileges to the most disadvantaged Explanation: This principle suggests that people who share similar traits and capabilities should be treated equally, regardless of their background or social status.17 / 2017. What is the relationship between justice and equality? A. Equality is irrelevant in the pursuit of justice B. Justice is only concerned with individual rights, not social equality C. Justice may require different treatment for people with different needs to achieve equality D. Justice and equality are always synonymous Explanation: The passage explains that justice is not just about treating everyone the same but also about considering special needs to ensure that everyone has equal opportunities.18 / 2018. What is the concept of distributive justice concerned with? A. The concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few B. The strict enforcement of laws and punishment for wrongdoers C. The promotion of individual freedom without any limitations D. The fair distribution of goods and services within a society Explanation: Distributive justice deals with how resources and opportunities are allocated among different members of society to ensure fairness.19 / 2019. What is the debate about free markets versus state intervention in the context of social justice? A. Whether the state should control all aspects of the economy or allow complete individual freedom B. Whether social justice is a relevant goal for governments or should be left to private charity C. Whether free markets always ensure a just distribution of resources or whether state intervention is needed to help the disadvantaged D. Whether equality of outcomes or equality of opportunity should be the primary focus Explanation: The passage discusses the ongoing debate about the best way to achieve social justice, with some advocating for free markets and others supporting state intervention to address inequalities.20 / 2020. What is the purpose of land reforms in the context of social justice? A. To discourage agricultural production and promote industrialization B. To redistribute land in a more equitable manner and address historical inequalities C. To concentrate land ownership in the hands of a few wealthy individuals D. To create a society where everyone has identical land holdings Explanation: Land reforms are mentioned as a way to address unequal distribution of land resources and promote social justice.Please insert your information to see your ranking अपनी Ranking जानने के लिए कृपया अपनी जानकारी भरे NamePhone Number Your score isThe average score is 0% 0% Restart quiz Category: Class 11 Political Science Quizzes in English
