Class 11 Political Science Book 2 ch 6 practice quiz in English part 3 Posted on March 16, 2025March 16, 2025 by Anshul Gupta0% 0 votes, 0 avg 1 Class 11 Political Science Book 2 ch 6practice quiz in English part 3 1 / 201. How can public interest litigation (PIL) help the poor? A. By ensuring they are not discriminated against in the legal process B. By allowing public-spirited individuals and organizations to raise their concerns in court C. By guaranteeing them free legal representation in all cases D. By providing them with financial assistance to fight legal cases Explanation: PIL enables those who may not have the resources or capacity to approach the courts themselves to have their issues addressed through legal action.2 / 202. What is the main difference between the judicial system in Ecuador and India, as highlighted in the statement? A. The lack of public interest litigation in Ecuador, hindering access to justice for the poor B. The lack of a system of judicial precedent in Ecuador, where judges are not bound by higher court rulings C. The absence of a written constitution in Ecuador, leading to greater judicial discretion D. The limited power of the judiciary in Ecuador compared to the Indian judiciary Explanation: The statement points out that Ecuadorian judges have more flexibility in their decisions compared to Indian judges who are bound by precedents set by higher courts.3 / 203. What is a potential area of conflict between the judiciary and the Parliament? A. The appointment of judges B. The judiciary's intervention in the internal functioning of the Parliament C. The scope of the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution D. The salaries and allowances of judges Explanation: Questions about whether the judiciary can interfere with the Parliament’s power to regulate its own affairs can lead to disagreements. 4 / 204. Can judicial activism lead to a conflict between the judiciary and the executive? Why? A. Yes, because judicial activism gives the executive more power over judicial appointments B. No, because judicial activism ensures that the executive acts in accordance with the Constitution C. Yes, because judicial activism can involve the judiciary making decisions that traditionally fall under the executive's domain D. No, because judicial activism strengthens the separation of powers between the two branches Explanation: When the judiciary actively intervenes in policy matters, it can potentially overstep its boundaries and create friction with the executive.5 / 205. How is judicial activism related to the protection of fundamental rights? A. Judicial activism gives the Parliament the power to restrict fundamental rights in the interest of public policy B. Judicial activism has no relation to the protection of fundamental rights C. Judicial activism helps protect fundamental rights by allowing the judiciary to strike down laws that violate them D. Judicial activism hinders the protection of fundamental rights by limiting the scope of judicial review Explanation: Through judicial activism, the judiciary can actively interpret and enforce fundamental rights, ensuring they are not infringed upon by the legislature or executive.6 / 206. What is the primary role of the judiciary in a democracy? A. To make laws and policies B. To conduct elections and form governments C. To implement government decisions D. To interpret laws and protect rights Explanation: The judiciary serves as a check on the other branches of government, ensuring that laws are applied fairly and that rights are upheld.7 / 207. Who is eligible for free legal services under the Indian legal system? A. All citizens regardless of their financial status B. A range of vulnerable groups including women, children, SC/ST members, and those with disabilities C. Only individuals accused of criminal offenses D. Only individuals with an annual income below a certain threshold Explanation: The Indian legal system provides free legal aid to ensure access to justice for those who may not be able to afford it. 8 / 208. Which jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is invoked when the government seeks its opinion on a legal matter? A. Original jurisdiction B. Appellate jurisdiction C. Writ jurisdiction D. Advisory jurisdiction Explanation: The government can refer matters of public importance or those requiring constitutional interpretation to the Supreme Court for advice under its advisory jurisdiction.9 / 209. Has judicial activism helped expand the scope of fundamental rights? A. Yes, judicial activism has led to the recognition of new rights, such as the right to a clean environment B. No, the scope of fundamental rights is determined solely by the Constitution and cannot be expanded through judicial activism C. No, judicial activism has only focused on the enforcement of existing fundamental rights D. Yes, judicial activism has given the Parliament the power to create new fundamental rights Explanation: Judicial activism has played a role in broadening the understanding of fundamental rights, including recognizing rights that are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.10 / 2010. What is the main challenge in maintaining the independence of the judiciary? A. Preventing any external influence on judicial decision-making B. Ensuring that judges are adequately compensated for their work C. Giving the executive complete control over judicial appointments D. Allowing the Parliament to discuss the conduct of judges freely Explanation: The independence of the judiciary is essential for upholding the rule of law, but it can be threatened by various pressures, including political interference.11 / 2011. What is the key takeaway from the chapter on the judiciary? A. The judiciary is primarily concerned with resolving disputes between private parties B. The judiciary is a passive institution that only responds to cases brought before it C. The judiciary is subordinate to the executive and legislature and has limited powers D. The judiciary is an independent and powerful body that plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and protecting rights Explanation: The chapter emphasizes the significance of the judiciary in a democracy, highlighting its independence, authority, and its function in safeguarding the Constitution and the rights of citizens.12 / 2012. What is the significance of the “Legal Services Day”? A. It commemorates the adoption of the Indian Constitution B. It marks the establishment of the Supreme Court of India C. It celebrates the role of legal professionals in upholding the rule of law D. It promotes awareness about legal aid and access to justice Explanation: Legal Services Day aims to highlight the importance of providing legal services to all, especially the marginalized and disadvantaged. 13 / 2013. What is the role of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA)? A. To oversee the functioning of the Supreme Court B. To provide legal education to law students C. To coordinate the provision of legal aid services across India D. To advise the government on legal matters Explanation: NALSA plays a central role in ensuring the availability and quality of legal aid services throughout the country. 14 / 2014. What is the importance of public interest litigation (PIL) in a democracy? A. It leads to frequent conflicts between the judiciary and the executive B. It reduces the judiciary's focus on protecting fundamental rights C. It restricts access to justice for marginalized groups D. It promotes social justice and empowers citizens to hold the government accountable Explanation: PIL serves as a tool for addressing public concerns and ensuring that the government acts in the interest of the people, especially those who may not have the means to seek legal recourse on their own.15 / 2015. What is the significance of the Kesavananda Bharati case? A. It established the principle of judicial independence B. It clarified the procedure for appointing judges C. It introduced the concept of the basic structure of the Constitution D. It defined the scope of PIL Explanation: This landmark case established that certain core principles of the Constitution cannot be altered even through amendments. 16 / 2016. What is the significance of the power of judicial review? A. It allows the judiciary to resolve disputes between political parties B. It gives the judiciary the authority to amend the Constitution C. It allows the judiciary to control the actions of the executive D. It enables the judiciary to ensure that laws are consistent with the Constitution Explanation: Judicial review is a crucial tool for maintaining the balance of power and preventing any branch of government from exceeding its constitutional limits.17 / 2017. What is the main point of contention in the example of the chikoo growers’ case against Reliance Energy? A. The farmers' demand for the closure of the thermal power plant B. The company's refusal to pay compensation to the affected farmers C. The government's failure to enforce environmental regulations D. The pollution caused by the company's thermal power plant and its impact on the environment and livelihoods Explanation:** The case highlights the conflict between industrial activity and its environmental consequences, with the judiciary intervening to protect the rights and livelihoods of the affected farmers.18 / 2018. What is the primary function of the judiciary in the example of the Centre and Delhi government jointly approaching the Supreme Court on the CNG issue? A. To interpret the existing laws and regulations related to the CNG policy B. To enforce the Supreme Court's previous orders on the CNG policy C. To mediate between the Centre and the Delhi government on the CNG issue D. To challenge the government's decision to implement the CNG policy Explanation: The judiciary’s role in this case is to clarify the legal framework surrounding the CNG policy and ensure its proper implementation.19 / 2019. What is the purpose of Lok Adalats? A. To challenge the constitutionality of laws B. To review decisions made by lower courts C. To provide a platform for alternative dispute resolution D. To conduct trials for serious criminal offenses Explanation: Lok Adalats offer a less formal setting for resolving disputes, often through mediation and compromise. 20 / 2020. How does the Indian Constitution attempt to balance the powers of the judiciary and the Parliament? A. By establishing a system of checks and balances where each branch has defined roles and limitations B. By allowing the Parliament to overturn any judicial decision C. By giving the judiciary complete control over the legislative process D. By making the judiciary completely subordinate to the Parliament Explanation: The Constitution aims to prevent any single branch from becoming too powerful by dividing powers and creating mechanisms for oversight.Please insert your information to see your ranking अपनी Ranking जानने के लिए कृपया अपनी जानकारी भरे NamePhone Number Your score isThe average score is 45% 0% Restart quiz Category: Class 11 Political Science Quizzes in English
